Legal Opinion

People v. Southern

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1943No. Docket No. 81, Calendar No. 42,074PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

Defendant was convicted and sentenced for violating Act No. 328, § 457, Pub. Acts 1931 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 17115-457, Stat. Ann. §28.712).

He appeals and contends that his motion to quash the information should have been granted because the evidence presented to the examining magistrate was insufficient to establish probable cause to believe him guilty of the crime charged. Repetition of such testimony is unnecessary. We have reviewed that portion of the testimony of the prosecutrix given at the examination, as quoted by the trial court in stating his reasons for denying defendant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HawthorneMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. TenerowiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. O'HaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. DochstaderMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. People v. KoukolMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. LytalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. HenceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. State v. RiddleUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API