Legal Opinion
Rose v. Village of Peninsula
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 27, 1995No. 1:93-mc-00001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Currently pending in this action are the following motions: (1) motion by all defendants for summary judgment on all counts (docket no. 49); (2) motion by defendants Ruoff and Redmon for summary judgment on counts III and IV, based on qualified immunity (docket no. 50); (3) motion by all defendants for summary judgment on all claims brought by plaintiff Becker based on Becker’s execution of a release (docket no. 51); and (4) motion by all plaintiffs for summary judgment on Counts I and II (docket no. 58). For the reasons set forth below, the Court rules…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DePiero v. City of MacedoniaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Depiero v. City Of MacedoniaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Mobility Workx, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Bailey v. CITY OF BROADVIEW HEIGHTS, OHIODistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Brucker v. City of DoravilleDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.