Gilmartin v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court 1
The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion of the court.
2Opinion of the Court · JonesJones, Chief Judge
This is an action by a retired army officer for the difference in retired pay of a colonel with over 26 years’ service, to which plaintiff asserts he is entitled, and the retired pay of a lieutenant colonel with like service, which plaintiff has actually received, since August 1, 1950.
Plaintiff entered the United States Military Academy on June 14,1918, and served as a cadet from that date to June 27, 1918, and from August 31, 1918, until his graduation on June 14, 1922. Upon graduation he was commissioned as a second lieutenant in…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. NoceSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
4Cited by4 opinions
- Travis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Winfree v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Travis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Travis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956