Legal Opinion

Gilmartin v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 13, 1953No. 142-52PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion of the court.

2Opinion of the Court · JonesJones, Chief Judge

This is an action by a retired army officer for the difference in retired pay of a colonel with over 26 years’ service, to which plaintiff asserts he is entitled, and the retired pay of a lieutenant colonel with like service, which plaintiff has actually received, since August 1, 1950.

Plaintiff entered the United States Military Academy on June 14,1918, and served as a cadet from that date to June 27, 1918, and from August 31, 1918, until his graduation on June 14, 1922. Upon graduation he was commissioned as a second lieutenant in…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. NoceSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Travis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  2. Winfree v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. Travis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. Travis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API