Legal Opinion
Schlecter v. Hollander
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 17, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
11 N.J. Super. 236 (1951)
78 A.2d 279
ROSE SCHLECTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PHILIP HOLLANDER AND MATILDA HOLLANDER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 18, 1950.
Decided January 17, 1951.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Huyler E. Romond argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. John E. Toolan, attorney).
Mr. Morris N. Hartman argued the cause for the defendants-appellants (Mr. Dougal Herr, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.
The defendants appeal from the judgment of the Chancery Division…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gerba v. MitruskeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- State v. RichardsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- The Caldwell B. L. Assn. v. HenryNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Hulmes v. ThorpeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1846
- Nissel v. SwinleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hodes v. DunskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Tiedemann v. CozineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- WILLOW BROOK RECR. CENTER, INC. v. SelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967