Legal Opinion

King v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1987No. Appeal, 434 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

This is a pro se petition for writ of mandamus which essentially contends that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (the Board) on or about November 13, 1985, notified petitioner of a decision denying him parole. Petitioner contends, in his argument, that the reason for this denial is his effort to assist fellow prisoners in their legal problems. In a per curiam order dated February 26, 1986, this Court ordered that the case be treated as a petition for review in the nature of an appeal from a denial of parole addressed to this Courts appellate jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Reider v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Barnhouse v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wayne Paul Burkett v. William Love, Superintendent, Answering Blair County District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. StarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. McFadden v. LehmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Rodgers v. Parole Agent SCI-Frackville, WechDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API