Legal Opinion

Pisarski v. City of Pittsburgh

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided January 30, 1958No. 949Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cercone, J.,

— This matter comes before the court en banc on exceptions to the adjudication and the decree nisi of the chancellor in proceedings in equity.

The facts have been agreed upon by the parties, and are set forth accordingly.

The parties have not agreed as to the amount of the damages, if any, that are to be assessed, as will appear in that part of the statement relating to damages.

It is admitted that Chatsworth Street is a city street and that the City of Pittsburgh is charged with its maintenance, including the drainage thereof.

In 1924, plaintiffs purchased a piece of real estate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Bowman v. Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Torrey v. City of Scranton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1890
  4. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Tri-Cities Water Co. v. MonessenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API