Legal Opinion

Newbury v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Whedbee, J., Eebruary Term, 1914, of DUPLIN.

1Opinion of the Court

Clare, C.- J.

Wben tbis case was before us, 160 N. 0., 156, this Court held that the local station agent of a railroad company is not presumed to have authority to contract with a traveling troupe to furnish a baggage car for the hauling, of its platform, tents, etc., for an indeterminate period, and to recover damages for breach of contract when made by an agent of tbis character for failure to furnish a baggage car at other stations beyond that of the alleged contract, special authority must be shown, or it must appear that the contract has been in some way approved or ratified by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newberry v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Powell v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Guilford Lumber Manufacturing Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Lumber Co. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Powell v. King Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API