Scott v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
This appellant’s jury trial resulted in a verdict of guilty on a complaint charging him with driving a vehicle on a highway while dru-nk or intoxicated.
The testimony of Mr. W. C. Glenn, a State Highway Patrolman, tended to establish abundantly the guilt of this appellant when he was arrested at about 4:00 P.M.
The -tendency of the evidence presented by the defense was to negative any condition of intoxication or misconduct on the part of the defendant on the occasion in question.
Thus purely a question of fact, solely within the province of the jury to resolve, was presented on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Childress v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Conn v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Forrester v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962
- McTerry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Hobson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
- Veasey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.