Conn v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
From a judgment of conviction for manslaughter in the first degree, defendant appeals.
Counsel for appellant assigns errors, 34 in number. As stated in the case of Null v. State, 16 Ala. App. 542, 79 South. 678, we think the assignment of error in a criminal case is good practice and is to be commended, though not required by statute. ¡We there stated that., by this means the errors complained of are brought directly and specifically to the attention of the court, and at the same time in no manner can militate against a compliance by this court with the statutory requirement to consider all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Childress v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Winter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Crawley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hardwick v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Kitchens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Whigham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.