Legal Opinion

Roethlisberger v. Bank of Monticello

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The facts in this case are neither complicated nor in dispute. During his lifetime Simon Roeth-lisberger owned a real-estate mortgage securing a loan of $30,000, the mortgage debtors being Messrs. Zurfluh, Kaempfer, and Portman. On March 6, 1920, Roethlis-berger, by assignment absolute in form, assigned the mortgage to the defendant bank as collateral security for a loan of $11,000 and any additional amounts that might subsequently be loaned. Thereafter, on February 27, 1927, Roethlisberger assigned the mortgage to Rolph Brothers to secure the payment of a debt of about $12,500, and later he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anglo-California Trust Co. v. Oakland RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Giffert v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Union National Bank v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Amick v. Empire Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Alexander v. Fidelity Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API