Legal Opinion
People v. Biscailuz
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 1951No. Civ. 18464PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment denying petitioner’s application for a writ of mandate to compel respondent sheriff of Los Angeles County to pay to the Department of Employment (hereinafter referred to as the department) $449.59 held by the sheriff pursuant to the levy of a warrant issued by the department for the collection of contributions owed by one Martin Topper to the department under the provisions of the California Unemployment Insurance Act, petitioner appeals.
Facts: Martin Topper, an employer within the meaning of the term in section 9 of the California Unemployment Act (hereinafter referred to as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Triborough Bridge AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Nutter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- In Re Van WinkleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
- Van Orden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Durkin v. DurkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Wilkinson v. WilkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Wright v. Standard Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972