Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants Irrigation Co. v. Brumbaugh

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1908No. 15,165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Dawson county: Bruno O. Hostetler, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Fawcett, C.

The petition sets out three causes of action. The first and second are upon promissory notes given as a part of the purchase price of a perpetual water right for 80 acres of land in Dawson county. The third is for moneys claimed by plaintiff to be due, at the rate of 50 cents an acre per annum, for maintenance fees. The defense to the first and second causes of action is that plaintiff has wholly failed, neglected and refused to furnish defendant any water, although often requested so to do; that plaintiff has sold water rights above the land .of defendant far *642in excess of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers Canal Co. v. FrankNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Renfrew v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Boyer v. RichardsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Smith v. KennardNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Lathrope v. McBrideNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morrow v. DowningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Faught v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Dow v. BryantWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Peterson v. Gering Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API