Legal Opinion
Bolan v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 31, 1942No. Civil Action No. 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the action brought by the plaintiff on his own behalf and “in behalf of all other employees similarly situated” to recover Overtime and compensation claimed to be due under Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, c. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., hereinafter called “The Act”.
The Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor was allowed to intervene and a brief was filed opposing the motion upon the ground referred to in the next paragraph.
The complaint was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Uravic v. F. Jarka Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson v. Manhattan Lighterage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Walling v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
- Walling v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Daffin v. PapeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Jordan v. American Oil Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.