Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Farruggio v. Nenna

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.

The subject matter with which this habeas corpus application is concerned, is res nova; therefore, I am constrained to decide the application without the benefit *230of precedents. The lawyers in their briefs submitted no authorities on the major question. None could be found on personal research.

The salient facts of this application are these:

On January 22, 1968, Miguel Santiago, on his own volition, committed himself to the custody of the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission, at a Special Term of the Supreme Court, held in the County of Kings. On February 15, 1968, Richard Valez, the other…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re FreemanNew York City Family Court · 1980
  2. People v. OrtegaNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. BifulcoNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. MalloyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1968
  5. State v. Iowa District Court for Winneshiek CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API