People ex rel. Farruggio v. Nenna
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.
The subject matter with which this habeas corpus application is concerned, is res nova; therefore, I am constrained to decide the application without the benefit *230of precedents. The lawyers in their briefs submitted no authorities on the major question. None could be found on personal research.
The salient facts of this application are these:
On January 22, 1968, Miguel Santiago, on his own volition, committed himself to the custody of the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission, at a Special Term of the Supreme Court, held in the County of Kings. On February 15, 1968, Richard Valez, the other…
2Cited by7 opinions
- In re FreemanNew York City Family Court · 1980
- People v. OrtegaNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. BifulcoNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. MalloyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1968
- State v. Iowa District Court for Winneshiek CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.