Legal Opinion

People v. Malloy

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided December 4, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmos S. Basel, J.

On June 9, 1968 at about 1:00 a.m. at the center operated by the Narcotics Addiction Control Commission, hereinafter referred to as NACC, at 232 East 12th Street, defendants Johnson, Robinson, Harvin were arrested. They were voluntary residents of that community, as certified addicts, civilly committed under section 206 of the Mental Hygiene Law. They were apprehended allegedly in the moment of an attempted escape.

On July 12, 1968 the defendants Hogue, Bryant and Malloy also certified as addicts under a voluntary civil commitment, did in fact escape from the same rehabilitation center.

All six…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. John Sas v. State of Maryland, Director of Patuxent Institution, Albert Delanor Murel v. State of Maryland and Director of Patuxent Institution, James C. Shine v. State of Maryland, Director of Patuxent Institution and the Maryland State Legislature, Timothy Patrick O'COnnOr v. State of Maryland Director, Patuxent Institution, George L. Creswell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. People ex rel. Haines v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. People v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. People ex rel. Blunt v. Narcotic Addiction Control CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re FreemanNew York City Family Court · 1980
  2. People v. OrtegaNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. BifulcoNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State, in Interest of MsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. State ex rel. M. S.New York County Court, Essex County · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API