Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 6, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2001-2094PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a dispute between attorneys over who will reap the rewards of a sprawling litigation against the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran) under the state sponsor of terrorism exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). Nearly a decade ago, this Court lamented the “contentious road blocks and setbacks in what has been an increasingly futile exercise to hold Iran accountable for unspeakable acts of terrorist violence.” In re Islamic Republic of Iran Terrorism Litigation, 659 F.Supp.2d 31, 35 (D.D.C.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hill v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  2. United States v. Sum of $70,990,605District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. Yankton Sioux Tribe v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API