Legal Opinion

Hill v. Gray

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 3, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2013-0001Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CYNTHIA S. HILL, et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 13-cv-1 (TSC) ) HON. VINCENT GRAY, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Frederick Coles, III has filed a motion to enforce an attorney’s charging lien against Plaintiff Cynthia S. Hill. (ECF No. 84, Coles Mot. to Enf. Charging Lien.) Coles withdrew as counsel for Hill before she reached a settlement with the District of Columbia and subsequently demanded attorney’s fees from her. For the reasons set forth below, the court will DENY Coles’ motion. I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. KriseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Estate of FalcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Kaushiva v. HutterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Cobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Green v. Louis Fireison & AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API