Legal Opinion

Somerville v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 4, 1945No. 8864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

One part of the language on which the plaintiff relied in this action for libel was incapable of a defamatory meaning. The other part was obviously true. Regardless of the defense of privilege, therefore, the District Court was right in directing a verdict for the defendant. Meyerson v. Hurlbut, 68 App.D.C. 360, 362, 98 F.2d 232, 118 A.L.R. 313; Sullivan v. Meyer, 67 App. D.C. 228, 91 F.2d 301; cf. Sullivan v. Meyer, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 367, 141 F.2d 21.

Affirmed

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meyerson v. HurlbutCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Sullivan v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  3. Sullivan v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harold R. Olinger v. American Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Curtis Publishing Company v. Harry H. VaughanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Williams v. Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Curtis Publishing Company v. Harry H. VaughanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960