Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
This application for a writ of certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission against the petitioner is denied upon the following considerations:
The applicant for compensation, Roberts, was a bookkeeper amd clerk of one C. H. Kobicke at the time the accident happened. Among his duties was to write letters for his employer and to take these letters to the nearest mail box, which was at the corner of Valencia and another street, in doing which it was necessary for him to cross Valencia Street, and this he did in performing this duty perhaps once each…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coronado Beach Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Kimbol v. Industrial Acc. CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Fishering v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Balboa Amusement Producing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by20 opinions
- Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Chandler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Pac. Emp. Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.