Shannon Furniture Co. v. Federal Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
The plaintiff in error, as. plaintiff in the trial court, commenced an action against the defendant in error, as defendant in the ¡trial court, to recover on its “Paymaster, Messenger and Office Robbery Policy.” The general indemnity provision under which recovery is sought is contained in paragraph 3 of the indemnity provisions of the policy and is as follows:
“III. To indemnify the assured for all loss by robbery committed during the hours specified in section (a) of item 7 of the declarations, of property, from within the assured’s premises.”
Paragraph 4 of the policy immediately follows…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edmisson v. Drumm-Flato Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Brown v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, ConnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Wiest v. United States Health & Accident InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Ballard County BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Webb v. Missouri State Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- C. P. A. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Starmer v. Mid-West Chevrolet Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Powell v. SpenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Martin v. CooganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.