Legal Opinion

Knappmiller v. Bove

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 16, 2012No. 11-326PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendant Vaillancourt Tree-Landscape Service appeals a trial court decision denying its post-trial motion for attorney’s fees and costs under a theory of implied indemnification. The issue on appeal is whether indemnity for attorney’s fees is appropriate where a jury has found the putative indemnitor not liable in the underlying suit. We affirm.

¶ 2. Plaintiff Leonard Knappmiller owns a commercial property directly abutting a property owned by defendants Joseph and Carolyn Bove. This case grew from a dispute between Knappmiller and the Boves regarding the Boves’ decision to cut down and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. Quechee Lakes Landowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Albright v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. Windsor School District v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. Concord General Mutual Insurance v. WoodsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Town of Milton Board of Health v. Armand BrissonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  2. O'Rourke v. Lunde and The Housing Group Limited PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Hannah P. Sachs v. Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC and Caryn Waxman, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  4. Depot Square Pizzeria, LLC v. Dep't of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. Curran v. Building Fund of United ChurchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API