Legal Opinion
United States v. James Dunlap (98-3855) and Jakhan Thomas (98-3856)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 31, 2000No. 98-3855, 98-3856PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
The defendants-appellants James E. Dunlap, also known as “Fatty” (“Dunlap”), and Jakhan Thomas, also known as “Ja-Con” (“Thomas”), have each contested his respective sentence imposed following his conviction entered upon his guilty plea to conspiring to possess and distribute cocaine base (or “crack”). Both defendants have assailed their sentencing enhancements for possession of a dangerous weapon in connection with that offense. Dunlap has additionally challenged the district court’s quantification of cocaine base attributable -to him, whereas Thomas has…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Kenneth Joseph HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Sarah Speed v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Eric William KingsleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Bobby Webb (01-5682) and Preston Webb (01-5683)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Marilyn House McGahee (99-6109) Douglas McGuire (99-6434)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Camacho-ArellanoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.