Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Bearn

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 11, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL FROM NELSON CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The demurrer to the petition was properly sustained. The principal question presented below was, Is the contract of an infant void or voidable? Whether void or voidable we think is immaterial here. After the feme had signed the mortgage, and after her arrival at age, she and her husband were sued to foreclose itt The mortgage was foreclosed and the land sold, and no reason is shown why she did not make defense to the action of foreclosure. Pier infancy when she signed it was a complete defense, and should have been made in that action. There is no relief now for her in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schlenker v. Clark Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API