Legal Opinion

Fulgenitti v. Cariddi

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1935PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, bring this bill against the defendants, who are also husband and wife, to have declared null and void a certain “lease,” so called, of a driveway on land in which the plaintiffs claim to own the fee, to compel the removal of some fences and a “frame building” (referred to in the evidence as “chicken coops”) alleged to have been erected or used by the de*323fendants, which encroach upon the driveway and upon land of the plaintiffs, for an injunction and for damages. The defendants appeal from an interlocutory decree granting a temporary injunction, from an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pearson v. MulloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Epstein v. EpsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. A. T. Stearns Lumber Co. v. HowlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Holmes v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Gray v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Morin v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Sheppard Envelope Co. v. Arcade Malleable Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Jones v. GingrasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  5. Tattan v. KurlanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API