Legal Opinion

Spielman v. Herskovitz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1922No. 11,218PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Lake Superior Court; Virgil S. Reiter, Judge. Action by Nettie D. Herskovitz against J. Hamilton Spielman and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

— This was an action by appellee against appellants on a promissory note upon which appellee claimed there was a balance due of $3,000, and as ancillary thereto, there were proceedings in attachment and garnishment, alleging the nonresidence of appellants. On motion of appellant the garnishment proceedings were quashed, and there is therefore no question thereon for our consideration. Appellants each filed *134separate answers. Appellant Sophia Spielman answered in four paragraphs, the first a general denial, the second, want of consideration, the third, suretyship during coverture, and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. CoulterIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Moyer v. BrandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. FreezeIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Brinkman v. PacholkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. SurpriseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dayton Walther Corp. v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. LEE, ETC. v. DickersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Huff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Norrington v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Nikou v. INB National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API