Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Surprise
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Lake Circuit Court; W. 0. McMahan, Judge. Action by 'William Surprise against tbe Knickerbocker Ice Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant company appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtIbach, P. J.
— This was a suit to perpetually enjoin appellant, R. H. Adams, and Charles Nieman from entering upon appellee’s real estate and from cutting ice thereon, and for damages for cutting and removing ice therefrom. The case was dismissed as to Adams and Nieman before the filing of any pleadings by defendants. Upon trial had before the court without jury, judgment was rendered for $10 damages and costs, and an injunction was granted according to the prayer of the complaint. Three grounds of error are argued, (1) that the complaint is insufficient, (2) that the court erred in overruling appellant’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Owens v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Rooker v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Magnuson v. BillingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Pence v. GarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Truitt v. TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Royer v. State ex rel. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Fisher v. CareyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Haines v. TruebloodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Miller v. GatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Spielman v. HerskovitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.