Legal Opinion

Figula v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1939No. 13923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant and his wife and baby were riding in the family automobile, within the city limits of the City of Fort Worth, using a public thoroughfare that crosses the tracks of the “Rock Island” Railroad, which tracks were being used by appellee, Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Company, on 'which to operate its modern, “streamlined” passenger train that was propelled by a Deisel engine.

Appellee’s train is capable of great speed and is an innovation in this part of the land.

Instead of being equipped, as is provided by statute (Article 6371, Revised Civil Statutes, Vernon’s Ann.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corpus Christi St. & Interurban Ry. Co. v. KjellbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Walker v. Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Lander v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. S. Lightburne & Co. v. First National Bank of RockportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. St. Louis, Southwestern Railway Co. v. MauneyTexas Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Trousdale v. Texas & N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Bell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API