Legal Opinion

Landskroner v. McClure

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1988No. 17406PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Justice.

Janice Landskroner and Stanley Reiss, formerly a married couple, brought suit against their cotenant, Rex McClure, for breach of contract and fiduciary duties, for fraud and slander of title, and to quiet title to real property. The trial court found in favor of McClure on all claims and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The court’s findings of fact may be summarized as follows: In 1963, at public auction, two couples purchased adjacent lots. Plaintiffs purchased lot 15 and McClures purchased lot 17. Thereafter, the four individuals agreed to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gallegos v. WilkersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Beckstrom v. BeckstromUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lake v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Ulibarri Landscaping Material, Inc. v. Colony Materials, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. In the Matter of YalkutNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Pinnell v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Famiglietta v. Ivie-Miller Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API