Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Wise
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 15, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 3018PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an adverse possession case. Each side claimed to be the owner of a part of the other’s property through adverse possession. The parcel of property claimed by Knapp was designated in the trial court as Parcel No. 1 and that claimed by the Wises was designated Parcel No. 2. The trial court agreed with each and awarded the parties the claimed property. Both parties have appealed. We affirm. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law as to Knapp’s claim, but not as to appellants’ counterclaim. The facts considered in the light most favorable to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Plaza v. FlakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Normant v. Eureka Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Robin v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Wesolowski v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Rorebeck v. CristeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Penn v. IveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Sabino Town & Country Estates Ass'n v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Jones v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Berryhill v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Chandler v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.