Legal Opinion

Freyermuth v. South Bound Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1899PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Falligant. Effingham, superior court. May term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

1. In the present case the granting of a nonsuit is under review. The plaintiff below, who here complains that the trial judge erred in not submitting his case to the jury upon the evidence introduced in his behalf, was an employee of the South Bound Railroad Company. He was injured while riding upon a hand-car, the immediate cause of the injury being the falling from the car of a large crowbar which, as it descended, caught the plaintiff’s foot and precipitated him upon the rails in front of the car, which ran qver and crushed him. It appears that the plaintiff was one of a number of hands…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Wilson v. BlairMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Davis v. AkridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API