Legal Opinion
Karsdon v. Barringer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 25, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*552In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) the defendants Robert F. Barringer and Alice Barringer appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J., at the liability trial; Dabiri, J., at the damages trial), dated December 23, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability finding them 100% at fault in the happening of the accident, and a jury verdict on the issue of damages finding that the plaintiff sustained damages in the sums of $250,000 for past pain and suffering and $0 for future pain and suffering, and upon an order of the same court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garrett v. ManaserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Huerta v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Misa v. FilanciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Bennett v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- McCollin v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casella v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Brennan v. GormleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Gendusa v. Yu Lin ChenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Begum v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007