Legal Opinion

Gentle v. Kohler Co.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-S-586-NEPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LYNWOOD SMITH, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Karen Gentle, a former employee of defendant, Kohler Company (“Kohler”), seeks short- and long-term disability benefits through Kohler’s employee benefits plan.1 Plaintiff asserts claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.2 This action is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.3 Upon consideration of the pleadings, evidentiary submissions, and briefs, the court concludes that plaintiff is entitled to short-term disability benefits, but not…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API