Legal Opinion

People v. Garlock

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided April 6, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Aurelio, C. M.

The complaint charges a violation of section 1272 of the Penal Law. As far as it is relevant to the instant prosecution the section provides: “ Each person * * * carrying on a business * * * w^0 ¿oes not pay the wages of all his * * * employees in accordance with the provisions of the Labor Law, is guilty of a misdemeanor.”

The evidence before me establishes that the defendant, an attorney and counselor at law, failed to pay the complainant several weeks’ salary for services which she performed as a stenographer in his law office. Defendant denies this indebtedness. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. People v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. In re AriolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RowanNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API