Legal Opinion

People v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Hotchkiss, J.:

In the operation of the defendant’s railroad it has in its service the following persons, among others:

(A) A stenographer whose duties are to take dictation by shorthand and transcribe the same on a typewriter. Her compensation is at the rate of $960 per year, and she is paid $80 monthly.

(B) An accountant whose duties are with bills and payrolls. His compensation is at the rate of $1,500 per year, and he is paid $125 monthly.(0) A typist, his duties being to copy papers by typewriter. His compensation is at the rate of $540 per year, and he is paid $45 monthly.

(D) A rodman, who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farnum v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. J. B. & R. E. Walker, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. IKEA U.S., Inc. v. Industrial Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. New York State Labor Relations BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People ex rel. Cockcroft v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. People v. GarlockNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API