Legal Opinion

Scott v. Peabody Coal Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 15, 1910No. Gen. No. 14,864PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action in case for personal injuries. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles N. Goodnow, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

The fundamental question presented by the record is that of liability. The evidence shows without controversy that the action of the driver, Hughes, in inviting or permitting the plaintiff to ride on the wagon he was driving was entirely outside of, and beyond the scope of the business of the defendant, and the employment of the driver. The defendant had not permitted its drivers to allow, boys to ride on its wagons. On the contrary all drivers of coal wagons, and Hughes personally, had been forbidden to do that tiling. So far as the record, shows this was the first time any attempt had been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. WestIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Carl Corper Brewing & Malting Co. v. HugginsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. SchiavoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MoranAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rolfe v. . HewittNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Christie v. MitchellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Gruber v. Cater Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Braselton v. BrazellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Purcell v. DegenhardtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API