Legal Opinion

Daniel Mendoza Rivas v. Craig Koenig

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 9, 2026No. 4:24-cv-00007Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DANIEL MENDOZA RIVAS, Case No. 24-cv-00007-JST 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 8 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY MOTION 9 CRAIG KOENIG, Re: ECF No. 30 Defendant. 10 11 12 Plaintiff Daniel Mendoza Rivas has filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 13 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that in 2020 former Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) warden Craig 14 Koenig’s failure to enforce COVID protocols constituted deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s 15 safety and serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API