Legal Opinion

State v. Crisostomo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2000No. 22363PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C.J.

On February 25, 1998, defendant-appellant Joaquin Crisostomo was convicted of three counts of sexual assault in the third degree, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-732(l)(e) (1993), 1 and two counts of sexual assault in the fourth degree, in violation of HRS § 707-733(l)(a) (1993). 2 On appeal, Crisostomo argues that his conviction should be reversed because the trial court erred by: (1) dismissing, sua sponte, a juror who failed to timely appear on the second day of trial without sufficient cause or consultation with counsel; and (2)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kealoha v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. MooreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Mr. & Mrs. Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. MaraHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. KonohiaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. CramerHawaii Supreme Court · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API