State v. Huber
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 The sole issue in this prosecution for bail jumping is whether the evidence is sufficient to show that the person on trial was the same person who earlier had failed to appear in court. Answering no, we reverse and remand with directions to dismiss.
Morgan, J.
¶2 In June 2003, the State charged Wayne Alan Huber with violating a protection order and tampering with a witness. He was released and ordered to appear on July 10, 2003. On July 10, 2003, he failed to appear, and the court issued a bench warrant. In October, the State charged him with bail jumping.1
¶3 The bail jumping count was tried…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. GogginCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. SappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington, V. Nicholas Windsor AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- State v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.