Legal Opinion

State v. Santos

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 15, 2011No. 28983-4-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 Felony driving under the influence (DUI) requires a showing that the defendant has been convicted of previous DUIs within a given time frame. And, in Washington, the State must show that the person named in earlier judgments or court documents and the defendant presently sitting in the courtroom is the same person. The State did not make that showing here, so we reverse this felony DUI conviction and remand for entry of a conviction and a sentence for gross misdemeanor DUI.

FACTS

¶2 The State charged Heraquio Santos with felony DUI for driving “a motor vehicle in the State of Washington…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. BourneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. State v. BrezillacCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  2. State v. GogginCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State Of Washington, V. Nicholas Windsor AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  4. State Of Washington v. Raylyn K. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. State Of Washington, V John MilamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API