Legal Opinion

Pam Pino v. E.P. Higgs, Curt Faust, Marcella Wolf, Jim Naranjo, Harlan Weiss, Pablo Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1996No. 94-2079PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Pam Pino filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the six Appellees in their individual capacities. Appellant claimed that Appellees violated her constitutional rights by taking her from her home and transporting and detaining her for emergency mental health evaluations at Socorro General Hospital and Las Vegas Medical Center (LVMC), both in New Mexico.

The district court granted summary judgment motions in favor of Appellees Marcella Wolf and Harlan Weiss, M.D., because they were not state actors, and in favor of Appellees E.P. Higgs and Curt…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Bass v. Parkwood HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Colorado, Inc. , Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Taylor v. MeachamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Axson-Flynn v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Reynolds v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API