Legal Opinion

People v. Y.R.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 2014No. D063769PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J .

Y.R. appeals an order of the juvenile court finding that she committed vandalism (Pen. Code, 1 § 594, subds. (a) & (b)(1)) and trespass (§ 602, subd. (m)). Y.R. contends sufficient evidence does not support either finding. At trial, the prosecution proffered evidence to show Y.R. conspired with her boyfriend to commit a trespass, which would make her vicariously liable for the boyfriend’s acts of vandalism as a natural and probable consequence of the trespass. Y.R. insists the evidence does not establish that she entered and occupied real property. Thus, she…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Edgerly v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. People v. MoranteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. People v. Waite CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API