People v. Y.R.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, Acting P. J .
Y.R. appeals an order of the juvenile court finding that she committed vandalism (Pen. Code, 1 § 594, subds. (a) & (b)(1)) and trespass (§ 602, subd. (m)). Y.R. contends sufficient evidence does not support either finding. At trial, the prosecution proffered evidence to show Y.R. conspired with her boyfriend to commit a trespass, which would make her vicariously liable for the boyfriend’s acts of vandalism as a natural and probable consequence of the trespass. Y.R. insists the evidence does not establish that she entered and occupied real property. Thus, she…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Edgerly v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- People v. MoranteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. Waite CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020