Legal Opinion

Carlin v. Lindtveit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint to foreclose this second mortgage on which $170 was due named respondents as defendants, but asked no personal judgment. Naturally respondents did not attend the sale. Plaintiff's attorney bid in the property for $25. Respondents have had to make a motion to vacate a deficiency judgment against them for $253.26, which had been improperly entered upon this complaint. Plaintiff’s application under Code of Civil Procedure, section 1628, to bring a new suit on the bond has been denied. In view of the opposing affidavits, we cannot say that the court’s discretion has been improperly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Darmstadt v. MansonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. WielandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Stein v. BlatteNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Jamaica Savings Bank v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. In re WhalenNew York Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API