Legal Opinion

Stein v. Blatte

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley Harwood, J.

Motions by defendants to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], pars 4, 7) are granted as indicated below; the request by plaintiffs for nunc pro tunc leave to commence this action and for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [c]) is denied.

This is an action to recover an unpaid mortgage debt. In or about 1970, plaintiffs sold property located in Suffolk County to Nellen Development Corp. (NDC), a shell corporation in which defendant Blatte, defendant Mattikow and Cervera, now deceased, were principals. NDC took title subject to a first…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Weisel v. Hagdahl Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Scofield v. . DoscherNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. White v. WielandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. White v. WielandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. McKernan v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Roseanne Investors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Putnam County Savings Bank v. Bagen (In Re Bagen)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. Stein v. Nellen Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. 1873 Western Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Bank of New York v. Midland Avenue Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API