Legal Opinion
In Re Holiday Magic Securities & Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided December 27, 1973No. 124PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman.
The Panel having found, upon the basis of the papers submitted and the hearing held, that the actions listed on the attached Schedule A involve common questions of fact and that transfer of these actions to the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and would further the just and efficient conduct of the litigation,
It is ordered that all actions on the attached Schedule A pending in districts other than the Northern District of California be, and the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Master Key Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re Multidistrict Litigation Involving Butterfield Patent InfringementUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- In Re Glenn W. Turner Enterprises LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Holiday Magic Securities & Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re L. E. Lay & Co. Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- In re Holiday Magic Securities & Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- Ward v. Holiday Magic, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In re Holiday Magic Securities & Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.