Legal Opinion

In Re L. E. Lay & Co. Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 10, 1975No. 87PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III * , and STANLEY A. WEI-GEL * , Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.

Two antitrust class actions have been commenced in two separate districts by plaintiff Lucille Lollar charging that various defendants instituted and maintained reciprocal dealing agreements and tying arrangements and, furthermore, that they misused a common mortgage escrow trust fund. Plaintiff is both the class representative in the Texas class action and the purported class…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
  2. In Re Holiday Magic Securities & Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
  3. In re Boise Cascade Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glasstech, Inc. v. Ab Kyro OyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Hertz Corp. v. the Gator Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
  3. In Re Continental Grain Co., Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API