Legal Opinion

In re Axtell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Petition by the guardian of an infant for an order requiring 'the payment of the balance of the purchase price of premises sold under Hoav. Stat. § 6719 et seq. Respondents appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

It appears that Julia M. J. Axtell, in her *245life-time, filed & petition in the Wayne circuit court, in chancery, for license to sell certain real estate'of Joshua J. Axtell, a minor, situate in Bay county. Such proceedings were had therein that the premises were ordered to be sold to William J. Daunt and Edgar M. Sharp for the sum of §1,600, — $400 in cash, and the balance to be secured by a first mortgage on the premises, with interest at 7 per cent. Wallace A. Anger, an attorney of Wayne county, represented the petitioner in the proceedings. The guardian, as widow, claimed a dower interest…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maclean v. SpeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Ferguson v. ShepherdMississippi Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. NesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. C. H. Little Co. v. L. P. Hazen Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Koch v. SumnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Tessler v. RothmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In re Flynn's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API