Legal Opinion

Koch v. Sumner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1906No. Docket No. 17PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Bill by John Koch and Christian Koch, copartners as Koch Brothers, against May B. Sumner, and others, to enforce a mechanics’ lien. Defendant Sumner filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill asking for an accounting. From an order overruling a demurrer to the cross-bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Complainants seek by bill to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for the making of improvements and repairs upon the defendant’s dwelling house. The bill prays:

First, for an accounting; second, a lien upon the property for the amount found due; third, a decree against defendant May B. Sumner, and sale of the property upon default of payment; fourth, in case of sale, that all persons claiming through or under the defendant after the commencement of suit shall be forever barred; fifth, for other and further relief.

*359The defendant answered charging failure to perform the contract and damages accruing by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Foltz v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Hayden v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Third National Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Whipple v. FarrarMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Miller v. StepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. C. H. Little Co. v. L. P. Hazen Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sharon v. FeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Sacchetti v. Recreation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hatch v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Interstate Lumber Co. v. Loop Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API