Legal Opinion

George Weintraub & Sons Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 24, 1994No. 86-03-00417. Slip Op. No. 94-102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STIPULATED JUDGMENT ON AGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS

MUSGRAVE, Judge.

These actions, as prescribed by Rule 58.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of International Trade, have been stipulated for judgment on agreed statement of facts in which the parties agree that:

The imported merchandise, consisting of merchandise invoiced as “men’s cotton suits,” covered by the entries on the attached schedule, is to be reliquidated with a refund to plaintiff of 75% of the difference in duties between the duties actually assessed by the Customs Service under the Column 2 rate of item 379.62, TSUS, of 37.5%…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. George Weintraub & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. George Weintraub & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Executone Information Systems v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  2. Xerox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  3. Fujitsu Compound Semiconductor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API