Executone Information Systems v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
*961Opinion
Restani, Judge:
This action is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56. Plaintiff Executone Information Systems (“Executone”) challenges the United States Customs Service’s (“Customs”) denial of reliquidation of two entries pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1520(c)(1) (1988).1 Customs classified the entries under Item 8517.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, USITC Pub. 2333, sec. XVI, ch. 85, at 16 (Supp. 1991) [hereinafter “HTSUS”]. Customs assessed an ad valorem duty rate and liquidated the entries for additional monies after…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Itt Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Aviall of Texas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- George Weintraub & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Godchaux-Henderson Sugar Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- AT&T International v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Executone Information Systems v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Pan Pacific Textile Group, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997