Legal Opinion

Kuhnes v. Cahill

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1905PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun District Court.— Hon. Z. A. Church, Judge. The opinion states the case. From a judgment in favor of interveners, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Bishop, J.-

August 2, 1901, plaintiff sold to defendant, Cahill, a lot of hogs at the'agreed price of $323.60, for and on account of which Cahill drew a check in ordinary form, payable to plaintiff, on the First National Bank of Eoclcwell City. Plaintiff did not present the check at the bank for payment until about August 12, 1901, when pay*595ment was refused. It is conceded that at the time the check was drawn and presented Cahill had on deposit in said bank, subject to cheek, the sum of $794. Payment was refused because', just before the check was presented, the bank had been garnished at the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Elliott v. Capital City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Roberts v. Austin Corbin & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Schollmier v. SchoendelenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Moore v. LowreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leach v. Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Hove v. Stanhope State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Bradley v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  4. What Cheer Savings Bank v. MowerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. McClain v. TorkelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API